RUCK
Actionable rucking guides, science-backed tips, and training advice.

Calories: Weighted Vest Walking vs Rucking

· 8 min read · rory@getrucky.com

calories weighted vest metrics

Man walking outdoors with a pack, illustrating calorie burn context

I love a good number. Here’s how the math shakes out—and yes, you can sanity-check me with our calculator.

Three validated ways to estimate

  • Mechanical (Pandolf/Givoni–Goldman): Uses speed, grade, and load to approximate work[1].
  • MET-based: Standardized intensity (METs) multiplied by body mass and time[2].
  • Heart rate (Keytel): Uses average HR, age, sex, and weight[3].

Example: 80 kg person, +10 kg load (vest or ruck), 5 km in 60 min, mild hills.

  • Mechanical: ~450–650 kcal depending on terrain/grade.
  • MET (5–7 METs with load): ~480–560 kcal[2].
  • HR (140 bpm): ~400–600 kcal (individual variation)[3].

Try it yourself: Rucking Calorie Calculator.

Does vest vs ruck change calories?

Mostly via posture and breathing mechanics. The energy cost comes from total mass moved and terrain/grade; distribution differences are smaller than the big rocks: load, speed, slope, duration. Recent modeling also captures vest‑specific costs[4]. For comfort and breathing, see Backpack vs Vest and Vest vs Ruck.

Step-by-step example (plug into the calculator)

  1. Set body mass: e.g., 80 kg.
  2. Add external load: e.g., +10 kg (vest or ruck).
  3. Choose pace: ~5 km in 60 min (about 3.1 mph).
  4. Add terrain: flat vs mild rolling hills.

On flat ground, most methods converge around ~450–560 kcal for this setup. A mild 3–5% grade and uneven footing can push that higher—often 10–25% depending on speed and surface. For hill programming, see Incline Effects.

Caveats and pro tips

  • Device variability: wrist wearables can be off by 10–30%. Use consistent methods week to week.
  • HR drift: long sessions raise HR at the same pace; HR-based formulas may overestimate late in a workout.
  • Terrain multipliers: sand, mud, and grass spike cost beyond flat pavement. Program accordingly.
  • Progress one knob: time → grade → weight. Don’t move all three at once. See Best Pace & Distance and Ruck Weight.

References

  1. Pandolf, K.B., Givoni, B., & Goldman, R.F. (1977). Predicting energy expenditure with loads and grades. J Appl Physiol. PubMed.
  2. Compendium of Physical Activities (Walking). MET ranges for walking/backpacking/daypack. Compendium.
  3. Keytel, L.R. et al. (2005). Prediction of energy expenditure from heart rate. Eur J Appl Physiol. PubMed.
  4. Looney, D.P. et al. (2024). Metabolic Costs of Walking with Weighted Vests. Med Sci Sports Exerc. PubMed.

Additional perspectives

  • Zone 2 training (context): Peter Attia’s guide to Zone 2 and why it matters for mitochondrial health and aerobic capacity. Useful companion to rucking on easy days. Read the guide.
  • Popular commentary: Gary Brecka on weighted vests and walking—motivational perspective, not peer‑reviewed research. Watch on YouTube.

Rucking Calorie Calculator

Want a quick estimate? Use our free rucking calorie calculator (also searched as ruck calorie calculator, calories burned rucking calculator, or GoRuck calorie calculator): Open the Rucking Calorie Calculator. It supports body weight, external load (vest or pack), pace, grade, and terrain.

Calories: Vest vs Ruck — FAQ
Total mass moved is the big driver, so the difference is usually small at equal load. Vests may alter posture/ventilation; packs shift load to the hips/shoulders. Choose the tool that keeps form and breathing strong. Estimate your own scenario with the calculator.
Even a modest grade or unstable footing increases energy cost. Plan 10–25%+ higher on rolling hills or sand vs flat pavement, depending on speed and load. Use the grade/terrain options in the calculator to model it.

Enjoyed this guide? Download the app to track your rucks, calories, and progress: iOS · Android